Makes silk_ADD_SAT32() conform to the C standard
This changes the saturation test to ensure that it relies on the unsigned overflow behaviour (which is allowed) rather than the signed overflow behaviour (which is undefined).
This commit is contained in:
parent
367c394866
commit
94a4989cdb
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|||
#define silk_SMLAWW(a32, b32, c32) silk_MLA(silk_SMLAWB((a32), (b32), (c32)), (b32), silk_RSHIFT_ROUND((c32), 16))
|
||||
|
||||
/* add/subtract with output saturated */
|
||||
#define silk_ADD_SAT32(a, b) ((((a) + (b)) & 0x80000000) == 0 ? \
|
||||
#define silk_ADD_SAT32(a, b) ((((opus_uint32)(a) + (opus_uint32)(b)) & 0x80000000) == 0 ? \
|
||||
((((a) & (b)) & 0x80000000) != 0 ? silk_int32_MIN : (a)+(b)) : \
|
||||
((((a) | (b)) & 0x80000000) == 0 ? silk_int32_MAX : (a)+(b)) )
|
||||
|
||||
#define silk_SUB_SAT32(a, b) ((((a)-(b)) & 0x80000000) == 0 ? \
|
||||
#define silk_SUB_SAT32(a, b) ((((opus_uint32)(a)-(opus_uint32)(b)) & 0x80000000) == 0 ? \
|
||||
(( (a) & ((b)^0x80000000) & 0x80000000) ? silk_int32_MIN : (a)-(b)) : \
|
||||
((((a)^0x80000000) & (b) & 0x80000000) ? silk_int32_MAX : (a)-(b)) )
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue