Adding a safeguard against unstable LPC, so now there's no way (that I can
think of) to produce NaNs in the new PLC.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d69c1cb37c
commit
07fed1bf76
1 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1347,14 +1347,21 @@ static void celt_decode_lost(CELTDecoder * restrict st, celt_word16 * restrict p
|
|||
iir(e, st->lpc, e, len+st->mode->overlap, LPC_ORDER, mem);
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
float ratio, S2=0;
|
||||
float S2=0;
|
||||
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||
S2 += e[i]*1.*e[i];
|
||||
ratio = sqrt((S1+1)/(S2+1));
|
||||
if (ratio < 1)
|
||||
/* This checks for an "explosion" in the synthesis (including NaNs) */
|
||||
if (!(S1 > 0.2f*S2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||
e[i] = 0;
|
||||
} else if (S1 < S2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
float ratio = sqrt((S1+1)/(S2+1));
|
||||
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||
e[i] *= ratio;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i=0;i<MAX_PERIOD+st->mode->overlap-N;i++)
|
||||
st->out_mem[C*i+c] = st->out_mem[C*(N+i)+c];
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue