Adding a safeguard against unstable LPC, so now there's no way (that I can
think of) to produce NaNs in the new PLC.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d69c1cb37c
commit
07fed1bf76
1 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1347,13 +1347,20 @@ static void celt_decode_lost(CELTDecoder * restrict st, celt_word16 * restrict p
|
||||||
iir(e, st->lpc, e, len+st->mode->overlap, LPC_ORDER, mem);
|
iir(e, st->lpc, e, len+st->mode->overlap, LPC_ORDER, mem);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
float ratio, S2=0;
|
float S2=0;
|
||||||
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||||
S2 += e[i]*1.*e[i];
|
S2 += e[i]*1.*e[i];
|
||||||
ratio = sqrt((S1+1)/(S2+1));
|
/* This checks for an "explosion" in the synthesis (including NaNs) */
|
||||||
if (ratio < 1)
|
if (!(S1 > 0.2f*S2))
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||||
|
e[i] = 0;
|
||||||
|
} else if (S1 < S2)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
float ratio = sqrt((S1+1)/(S2+1));
|
||||||
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
for (i=0;i<len+overlap;i++)
|
||||||
e[i] *= ratio;
|
e[i] *= ratio;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i=0;i<MAX_PERIOD+st->mode->overlap-N;i++)
|
for (i=0;i<MAX_PERIOD+st->mode->overlap-N;i++)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue