When testing with custom entropy sources, if MBEDTLS_ENTROPY_NV_SEED
is enabled at compile time but the NV seed source is not used at
runtime, mbedtls_entropy_func makes a second pass anyway. Cope with
this in the test code by telling the entropy module not to make this
second pass.
Add a function to configure entropy sources. For testing only.
Use it to test that the library initialization fails properly if there is no
entropy source.
Detect Git merge artifacts. These are lines starting with "<<<<<<",
"|||||||" or ">>>>>>>" followed by a space, or containing just
"=======". For "=======", exempt Markdown files, because this can be
used to underline a title, as a compromise between false negatives and
false positives.
Programs and tests need to be able to use PSA header files when
USE_CRYPTO_SUBMODULE and MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_CRYPTO are set. Add the crypto
submodule include folder, which contains psa headers, after the main
include folder so that psa headers can be found and crypto submodule
headers don't take precedence over mbedtls headers.
The check-files script contains the strings "TODO" and "todo" in order to
search for files that contain TODO items. So, any check-files script would
need to be excluded from the list of files that gets checked for "TODO".
Normally, the script excludes itself from checks, but with the addition of
the crypto submodule, there is another copy of the script present from the
project root. We must avoid checking check-files scripts for TODO items.
This also helps if you run check-files from another working tree in your
working tree.
It's better for names in the API to describe the "what" (opaque keys) rather
than the "how" (using PSA), at least since we don't intend to have multiple
function doing the same "what" in different ways in the foreseeable future.
Unfortunately the can_do wrapper does not receive the key context as an
argument, so it cannot check psa_get_key_information(). Later we might want to
change our internal structures to fix this, but for now we'll just restrict
opaque PSA keys to be ECDSA keypairs, as this is the only thing we need for
now. It also simplifies testing a bit (no need to test each key type).
While at it, clarify who's responsible for destroying the underlying key. That
can't be us because some keys cannot be destroyed and we wouldn't know. So
let's leave that up to the caller.
So far, make sure we test the following ciphersuites
without any fallback to non-PSA ciphers:
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CCM
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CCM-8
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CCM
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CCM-8
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-GCM-SHA256
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-GCM-SHA384
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CBC-SHA
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CBC-SHA256
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CBC-SHA384
