From 9f8157f42cc0351833c030febe8a559719c875bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: SDL Wiki Bot Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:29:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Sync SDL3 wiki -> header [ci skip] --- include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h b/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h index 24f9e43bac..6ed692f382 100644 --- a/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h +++ b/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ * some amount of resources, but it is not an overwhelming cost. Do not make a * queue for each task, however. It is better to put many tasks into a single * queue. They will be reported in order of completion, not in the order they - * were submitted, so it doesn't generally matter what order tasks are started. + * were submitted, so it doesn't generally matter what order tasks are + * started. * * One async i/o queue can be shared by multiple threads, or one thread can * have more than one queue, but the most efficient way--if ruthless