asyncio: Added more category documentation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
58f8e259d1
commit
951ca96dc9
1 changed files with 38 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -59,6 +59,44 @@
|
|||
* SDL_LoadFileAsync as a convenience function. This will handle allocating a
|
||||
* buffer, slurping in the file data, and null-terminating it; you still check
|
||||
* for results later.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Behind the scenes, SDL will use newer, efficient APIs on platforms that
|
||||
* support them: Linux's io_uring and Windows 11's IoRing, for example. If
|
||||
* those technologies aren't available, SDL will offload the work to a thread
|
||||
* pool that will manage otherwise-synchronous loads without blocking the app.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ## Best Practices
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Simple non-blocking i/o--for an app that just wants to pick up data
|
||||
* whenever it's ready without losing framerate waiting on disks to spin--can
|
||||
* use whatever pattern works well for the program. In this case, simply call
|
||||
* SDL_ReadAsyncIO, or maybe SDL_LoadFileAsync, as needed. Once a frame, call
|
||||
* SDL_GetAsyncIOResult to check for any completed tasks and deal with the
|
||||
* data as it arrives.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If two separate pieces of the same program need their own i/o, it is legal
|
||||
* for each to create their own queue. This will prevent either piece from
|
||||
* accidentally consuming the other's completed tasks. Each queue does require
|
||||
* some amount of resources, but it is not an overwhelming cost. Do not make a
|
||||
* queue for each task, however. It is better to put many tasks into a single
|
||||
* queue. They will be reported in order of completion, not in the order they
|
||||
* were submitted, so it doesn't generally matter what order tasks are started.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* One async i/o queue can be shared by multiple threads, or one thread can
|
||||
* have more than one queue, but the most efficient way--if ruthless
|
||||
* efficiency is the goal--is to have one queue per thread, with multiple
|
||||
* threads working in parallel, and attempt to keep each queue loaded with
|
||||
* tasks that are both started by and consumed by the same thread. On modern
|
||||
* platforms that can use newer interfaces, this can keep data flowing as
|
||||
* efficiently as possible all the way from storage hardware to the app, with
|
||||
* no contention between threads for access to the same queue.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Written data is not guaranteed to make it to physical media by the time a
|
||||
* closing task is completed, unless SDL_CloseAsyncIO is called with its
|
||||
* `flush` parameter set to true, which is to say that a successful result
|
||||
* here can still result in lost data during an unfortunately-timed power
|
||||
* outage if not flushed. However, flushing will take longer and may be
|
||||
* unnecessary, depending on the app's needs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef SDL_asyncio_h_
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue