All tests files have .tests.cpp suffix. Also moved tests out of TestMain.cpp and moved up a level
This commit is contained in:
Phil Nash
parent
e34754e433
commit
74d3dfd4cc
32 changed files with 3323 additions and 3322 deletions
325
projects/SelfTest/UsageTests/Condition.tests.cpp
Normal file
325
projects/SelfTest/UsageTests/Condition.tests.cpp
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,325 @@
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Created by Phil on 08/11/2010.
|
||||
* Copyright 2010 Two Blue Cubes Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
|
||||
* file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef __clang__
|
||||
# pragma clang diagnostic push
|
||||
# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wpadded"
|
||||
# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wdouble-promotion"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#include "catch.hpp"
|
||||
|
||||
#include <string>
|
||||
#include <limits>
|
||||
#include <cstdint>
|
||||
|
||||
struct TestData {
|
||||
int int_seven = 7;
|
||||
std::string str_hello = "hello";
|
||||
float float_nine_point_one = 9.1f;
|
||||
double double_pi = 3.1415926535;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
struct TestDef {
|
||||
TestDef& operator + ( const std::string& ) {
|
||||
return *this;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TestDef& operator[]( const std::string& ) {
|
||||
return *this;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// The "failing" tests all use the CHECK macro, which continues if the specific test fails.
|
||||
// This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails
|
||||
|
||||
// Equality tests
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
TestDef td;
|
||||
td + "hello" + "hello";
|
||||
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven == 7 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.1f ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415926535 ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello == "hello" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( "hello" == data.str_hello );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() == 5 );
|
||||
|
||||
double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1;
|
||||
REQUIRE( x == Approx( 1.3 ) );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!mayfail]" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven == 6 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven == 8 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven == 0 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.11f ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.0f ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 1 ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 0 ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415 ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello == "goodbye" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello == "hell" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello == "hello1" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello.size() == 6 );
|
||||
|
||||
double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1;
|
||||
CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 6 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 8 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.11f ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.0f ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 1 ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 0 ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415 ) );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "goodbye" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hell" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hello1" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() != 6 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!shouldfail]" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven != 7 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.1f ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415926535 ) );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello != "hello" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello.size() != 5 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Ordering comparison tests
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven < 8 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 6 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 0 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven > -1 );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 7 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 6 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 7 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 8 );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one > 9 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 10 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 9.2 );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello <= "hello" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello >= "hello" );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "hellp" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "zebra" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "hellm" );
|
||||
REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "a" );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven > 7 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven < 7 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven > 8 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven < 6 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven < 0 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven < -1 );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven >= 8 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.int_seven <= 6 );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one < 9 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 10 );
|
||||
CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 9.2 );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello > "hello" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello < "hello" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello > "hellp" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello > "z" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello < "hellm" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello < "a" );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello >= "z" );
|
||||
CHECK( data.str_hello <= "a" );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __clang__
|
||||
# pragma clang diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Comparisons with int literals
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i = 1;
|
||||
unsigned int ui = 2;
|
||||
long l = 3;
|
||||
unsigned long ul = 4;
|
||||
char c = 5;
|
||||
unsigned char uc = 6;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( i == 1 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( ui == 2 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( l == 3 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( ul == 4 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( c == 5 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( uc == 6 );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( 1 == i );
|
||||
REQUIRE( 2 == ui );
|
||||
REQUIRE( 3 == l );
|
||||
REQUIRE( 4 == ul );
|
||||
REQUIRE( 5 == c );
|
||||
REQUIRE( 6 == uc );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( (std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max)() > ul );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Disable warnings about sign conversions for the next two tests
|
||||
// (as we are deliberately invoking them)
|
||||
// - Currently only disabled for GCC/ LLVM. Should add VC++ too
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-compare"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-conversion"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef _MSC_VER
|
||||
#pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
long long_var = 1L;
|
||||
unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
|
||||
unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
|
||||
unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1;
|
||||
unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_char_var );
|
||||
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_short_var );
|
||||
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_int_var );
|
||||
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
|
||||
const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
|
||||
const unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1;
|
||||
const unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( unsigned_char_var == 1 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( unsigned_short_var == 1 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( unsigned_int_var == 1 );
|
||||
REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) );
|
||||
CHECK( -1 > 2u );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( ( 2u < -1 ) );
|
||||
CHECK( 2u < -1 );
|
||||
|
||||
const int minInt = (std::numeric_limits<int>::min)();
|
||||
CHECK( ( minInt > 2u ) );
|
||||
CHECK( minInt > 2u );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
CHECK( 54 == 6*9 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return nullptr; }
|
||||
inline char* returnsNull(){ return nullptr; }
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
TestData* p = nullptr;
|
||||
TestData* pNULL = nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( p == nullptr );
|
||||
REQUIRE( p == pNULL );
|
||||
|
||||
TestData data;
|
||||
p = &data;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( p != nullptr );
|
||||
|
||||
const TestData* cp = p;
|
||||
REQUIRE( cp != nullptr );
|
||||
|
||||
const TestData* const cpc = p;
|
||||
REQUIRE( cpc != nullptr );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( returnsNull() == nullptr );
|
||||
REQUIRE( returnsConstNull() == nullptr );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( nullptr != p );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Not (!) tests
|
||||
// The problem with the ! operator is that it has right-to-left associativity.
|
||||
// This means we can't isolate it when we decompose. The simple REQUIRE( !false ) form, therefore,
|
||||
// cannot have the operand value extracted. The test will work correctly, and the situation
|
||||
// is detected and a warning issued.
|
||||
// An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture
|
||||
// the operand value.
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool falseValue = false;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( false == false );
|
||||
REQUIRE( true == true );
|
||||
REQUIRE( !false );
|
||||
REQUIRE_FALSE( false );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( !falseValue );
|
||||
REQUIRE_FALSE( falseValue );
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE( !(1 == 2) );
|
||||
REQUIRE_FALSE( 1 == 2 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool trueValue = true;
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( false != false );
|
||||
CHECK( true != true );
|
||||
CHECK( !true );
|
||||
CHECK_FALSE( true );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( !trueValue );
|
||||
CHECK_FALSE( trueValue );
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK( !(1 == 1) );
|
||||
CHECK_FALSE( 1 == 1 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue