Converted all test case names to "modern" style (freeform text + tags)

This commit is contained in:
Phil Nash 2013-11-19 07:21:03 +00:00
parent a9fd5b3f14
commit 337dc25ed7
17 changed files with 587 additions and 1217 deletions

View file

@ -43,8 +43,7 @@ struct TestDef {
// This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails
// Equality tests
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/equality",
"Equality checks that should succeed" )
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed", "" )
{
TestDef td;
@ -63,8 +62,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/equality",
REQUIRE( x == Approx( 1.3 ) );
}
TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/equality",
"Equality checks that should fail" )
TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail]", "[.][failing]" )
{
TestData data;
@ -85,8 +83,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/equality",
CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) );
}
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/inequality",
"Inequality checks that should succeed" )
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed", "" )
{
TestData data;
@ -103,8 +100,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/inequality",
REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() != 6 );
}
TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/inequality",
"Inequality checks that should fails" )
TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fails", "[.][failing]" )
{
TestData data;
@ -116,8 +112,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/inequality",
}
// Ordering comparison tests
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/ordered",
"Ordering comparison checks that should succeed" )
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed", "" )
{
TestData data;
@ -144,8 +139,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/ordered",
REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "a" );
}
TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/ordered",
"Ordering comparison checks that should fail" )
TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
{
TestData data;
@ -175,8 +169,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/ordered",
}
// Comparisons with int literals
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/int literals",
"Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned", "" )
{
int i = 1;
unsigned int ui = 2;
@ -214,8 +207,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/int literals",
#pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch
#endif
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions//long_to_unsigned_x",
"comparisons between int variables" )
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables", "" )
{
long long_var = 1L;
unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
@ -229,8 +221,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions//long_to_unsigned_x",
REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var );
}
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/const ints to int literal",
"comparisons between const int variables" )
TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables", "" )
{
const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1;
const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1;
@ -243,8 +234,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/const ints to int literal",
REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 );
}
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/negative ints",
"Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour", "" )
{
CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) );
CHECK( -1 > 2u );
@ -266,8 +256,7 @@ struct Ex
T operator * ( const T& ) const { return T(); }
};
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/computed ints",
"Comparisons between ints where one side is computed" )
TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed", "" )
{
CHECK( 54 == 6*9 );
}
@ -279,8 +268,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/computed ints",
inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return NULL; }
inline char* returnsNull(){ return NULL; }
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/ptr",
"Pointers can be compared to null" )
TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null", "" )
{
TestData* p = NULL;
TestData* pNULL = NULL;
@ -312,8 +300,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/ptr",
// is detected and a warning issued.
// An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture
// the operand value.
TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/not",
"'Not' checks that should succeed" )
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed", "" )
{
bool falseValue = false;
@ -329,8 +316,7 @@ TEST_CASE( "./succeeding/conditions/not",
REQUIRE_FALSE( 1 == 2 );
}
TEST_CASE( "./failing/conditions/not",
"'Not' checks that should fail" )
TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" )
{
bool trueValue = true;